CorText Manager around the world

@article{Giry0000,

title = {Cahier de l’ANR n°17 : Les défis de la ville en transition},

author = {Claire Giry},

url = {https://hal.science/hal-04706976/

https://hal.science/hal-04706976v1/file/ANR-Cahier-Villes-2024.pdf},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-09-24},

urldate = {2024-09-24},

journal = {ANR},

abstract = {Les cahiers de l’ANR traitent de questions thématiques transverses aux différents appels à projets financés par l’Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) et France 2030. Cette collection, qui existe depuis 2009, met en perspective les recherches, les innovations et les avancées en cours dans un domaine spécifique. Sans prétention d’exhaustivité, son objectif est de revenir sur les enjeux sociétaux et les défis d’avenir identifiés par les communautés de recherche mobilisées sur une thématique. Les cahiers de l’ANR s’adressent aussi bien aux chercheurs qu’aux décideurs politiques et au grand public.



Le présent cahier a pour thème principal la transition urbaine et a vocation à analyser dans quelles mesures les villes s’adaptent pour répondre aux enjeux climatiques, énergétiques et de biodiversité. Il fait référence aux différents projets de recherche financés par l’ANR dans ce domaine. Ce cahier, le dix-septième de la collection, a été coordonné par Anne Ruas, responsable scientifique à l’ANR, et Liz Pons, adjointe au responsable du département Sciences Physiques, Ingénierie, Chimie et Énergie, en collaboration avec la Direction de l’information et de la communication, la Direction de la Stratégie Numérique et des Données et la Direction des Grands Programmes d’Investissements de l’État.},

note = {HAL Id: hal-04706976},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Ollivier2024,

title = {The framings of the coexistence of agrifood models: a computational analysis of French media},

author = {Guillaume Ollivier and Pierre Gasselin and Véronique Batifol},

url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-023-10531-6

https://rdcu.be/dAuZ4

},

doi = {10.1007/s10460-023-10531-6},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-02-07},

urldate = {2024-02-07},

journal = {Agriculture and Human Values},

abstract = {The confrontations of stakeholder visions about agriculture and food production has become a focal point in the public sphere, coinciding with a diversification of agrifood models. This study analyzes the debates stemming from the coexistence of these models, particularly during the initial term of neoliberal-centrist Emmanuel Macron’s presidency in France.

Employing collective monitoring from 2017 to 2021, a corpus of 958 online news and blog articles was compiled. Using a computational analysis, we reveal the framings and controversies emerging from this media discourse. The macro-structuring of discourse on model coexistence revolves around scientific, economic and political framings. Coexistence is a complex of debates based on specific frames associated with specific arenas and actor configurations: growth of organic agriculture, transformations of agrifood systems, sciences of production and impacts, livestock and meat diet controversies, agroecological innovations, CAP reform criticism, discourse of peasant agriculture and State-Profession co-gestion. Employing global sentiment analysis and focusing on salient controversies, namely EGAlim law, pesticide regulations, and agribashing, we show the shift from conciliation to a hardening of debates. Finally, we discuss the causes and consequences of this trend. The political will to support the transition of agriculture remains influenced by the co-gestion system, an inherited configuration of decision-makers instrumental in the agricultural modernization. As a consequence, significant agricultural challenges, particularly highlighted in the scientific macro-frame, persist unresolved. This lock-in of the agrifood system is based on defensive strategies that challenge the democratic debate about food and agricultural practices.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Mason2023d,

title = {Sustainable soil and land management: a systems-oriented overview of scientific literature},

author = {Eloïse Mason and Antonio Bispo and Mireille Matt and Katharina Helming and Elena Rodriguez and Rocio Lansac and Violeta Carrasco and Mohammad Rafiul Hashar and Loes Verdonk and Gundula Prokop and David Wall and Nancy Francis and Peter Laszlo and Michael T. Löbmann},

url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoil.2023.1268037/full

},

doi = {10.3389/fsoil.2023.1268037},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-12-18},

journal = {Frontiers in Soil Science},

abstract = {Healthy soil is vital for our wellbeing and wealth. However, increasing demand for food and biomass may lead to unsustainable soil and land management practices that threaten soils. Other degradation processes such as soil sealing also endanger soil resources. Identifying and accessing the best available knowledge is crucial to address related sustainability issues and promote the needed transition towards sustainable soil and land management practices. Such knowledge has to cover all knowledge domains, system knowledge, target knowledge, and transformation knowledge. However, a comprehensive overview of existing research addressing societal needs related to soil is still missing, which hinders the identification of knowledge gaps. This study provides a detailed analysis of scientific literature to identify ongoing research activities and trends. A quantitative and qualitative analysis of scientific literature related to sustainable soil and land management was conducted. A systems-oriented analytical framework was used that combines soil and land related societal challenges with related knowledge domains. Our analysis revealed a significant increase in scientific publications and related interest in soil and land use-related research, above the average increase of publications within all scientific fields. Different forms of reduction and remediation of soil degradation processes (e.g. erosion, contamination) have been studied most extensively. Other topic areas like land take mitigation, soil biodiversity increase, increase of ecosystem services provision and climate change mitigation and adaption seem to be rather recent concerns, less investigated. We could highlight the importance of context-specific research, as different regions require different practices. For instance, boreal, tropical, karst and peatland regions were less studied. Furthermore, we found that diversifying soil management practices such as agroforestry or including livestock into arable systems are valuable options for increasing biomass, mitigating/adapting to climate change, and improving soil related ecosystem services. A recent trend towards the latter research topic indicates the transition from a soil conservation-oriented perspective to a soil service-oriented perspective, which may be better suited to integrate the social and economic dimensions of soil health improvement alongside the ecological dimension.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Forty years of soil research funded by the European Commission: Trends and future. A systematic review of research projects},

author = {Cristina Arias-Navarro and Panos Panagos and v Jones and María José Amaral and Annette Schneegans and Marc Van Liedekerke and Piotr Wojda and Luca Montanarella},

url = {https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Panos-Panagos/publication/374619298_40_years_of_soil_research_funded_by_the_European_Commission_trends_and_future_A_systematic_review_of_research_projects/links/652fc4b173a2865c7abac9c1/40-years-of-soil-research-funded-by-the-European-Commission-trends-and-future-A-systematic-review-of-research-projects.pdf

https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13652389?journalRedirectCheck=true},

doi = {/10.1111/ejss.13423},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-09-27},

urldate = {2023-09-27},

journal = {European Journal of Soil Science},

abstract = {The European Green Deal with its high ambition has set the European Union (EU) on a promising path towards greater soil protection. The EU Soil Strategy 2030, the Biodiversity Strategy 2030, the Farm to Fork Strategy, the Zero Pollution, the Nature Restoration Law and the European Climate Law, among others, include actions to protect our soils. Research and Innovation (R&I) will play a key role in developing new knowledge and tools enabling the transition to healthy soils. The main aim of this paper is to analyse past and near-future trends in EU's funding for R&I on soil-related issues. For this purpose, a review of EU-funded soil projects was conducted based on the data available in the Community Research and Development Information Service and the official portal for European data. Our analysis shows that over the past 40 years, the EU has invested significantly in developing integrated knowledge about the relationships between soil functions and ecosystem services and how human-induced pressures affect soil health. Following the adoption of the EU Soil Thematic Strategy in 2006, there was an increase in research funding for soil-related research. Furthermore, our analysis also illustrates an interesting interplay of permanent and changing soil themes. The Horizon Europe Mission ‘A Soil Deal for Europe’, which aims to establish a network of 100 living labs and lighthouses to lead the transition towards healthy soils and safeguard human and planetary health by 2030, provides a further incentive for soil research. Together with the EU Soil Strategy 2030 and the new proposal for a Directive on Soil Monitoring and Resilience (Soil Monitoring Law), and the EU Soil Observatory (EUSO), the three instruments set up the political framework, concrete measures, and a monitoring system needed for the protection, restoration and sustainable use of soils.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Miara2023,

title = {Animal traction in developed countries: The reappropriation of a past practice through agroecological transition},

author = {M. Miara and P. Boudes and T. Rabier and M. Gafsi},

url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016723001900},

doi = {/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103124},

issn = {0743-0167},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-09-15},

urldate = {2023-09-15},

journal = {Journal of Rural Studies},

volume = {103},

pages = {103124},

abstract = {As part of the current agroecological transition, animal traction in agriculture is benefiting from an increased focus in developed countries. However, the practice is struggling to gain recognition from research, institutions and the agricultural profession. This article aims to analyze how animal traction is treated in developed countries, and to assess the extent to which it could be considered an agroecological practice. We analyze animal traction as a scientific object and a socio-professional movement. Our methodology is based on a review of scientific literature and an analysis of the French general press. The various studies show that animal traction has advantages in terms of energy, economics and agronomy. It tends to be developed by alternative movements and farmers motivated by a desire to redesign our food systems. Both scientific and press reviews show a renewed positive interest in animal traction. Although these reviews highlight its agroecological potential, the practice is facing difficulties in gaining recognition. The findings of this article are of obvious interest to rural development researchers and policy makers. They help the former to explore new issues in the return of animal traction, and the latter to better understand the development factors of this practice.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Veng2023,

title = {Is Denmark a green entrepreneurial state? Mapping Danish climate politics between civic mobilization and business cooptation},

author = {Adam Veng and Irina Papazu and Mads Ejsing},

url = {https://pure.itu.dk/en/publications/is-denmark-a-green-entrepreneurial-state-mapping-danish-climate-p

https://tidsskrift.dk/encounters/article/view/139817/183845

https://tidsskrift.dk/encounters/article/download/139817/183845/303522},

issn = {1904-4372},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-09-05},

journal = {STS Encounters},

volume = {15},

pages = {1-45},

publisher = {Danish Association of Science and Technology Studies},

abstract = {This article is based on digital methods research using the tools Hyphe, Gephi and CorText to map the relations between public Danish actors – from informal civil society groups and NGO’s to business and state actors - and their “matters of concern” (cf. Latour 2004) in the heated political situation around the development of green transition policies following the  enactment  of  the  Climate  Act  in  2019.  The  Act  was,  according  to  the  newly  elected  social  democratic  government,  the  “most  ambitious  Climate Act in the world”. It included such political innovations as the Citizens’ Assembly on Climate Change, a group of 99 randomly selected citizens mandated to give recommendations to parliament, and a series of  Climate  Partnerships,  business  and  industry  collaborations  tasked  with  developing  recommendations  and  frameworks  for  the  business  community’s engagement in the green transition. The Climate Act was passed after massive popular pressure from the civic climate movement leading up to the election. Despite these efforts and the apparent political will to engage with multiple voices and interests, our network mapping shows that the business community, with an emphasis on “innovative and technological solutions”, were soon to become dominant in the network and align themselves more closely with the political system than the civil society actors were able to with their repeated calls for more radical and political action on climate change.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Toffolini2022,

title = {On-farm experimentation practices and associated farmer-researcher relationships: a systematic literature review},

author = {Quentin Toffolini and Marie-Hélène Jeuffroy},

url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-022-00845-w},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00845-w},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-11-01},

urldate = {2022-11-01},

journal = {Agronomy for Sustainable Development},

volume = {42},

number = {114},

issue = {2022},

abstract = {The convergence among the rise of digital technologies, the attention paid to the localized issues of transitions in practices toward agroecology, and the emergence of new open innovation models are renewing and reviving the scientific community’s interest in on-farm experimentation (OFE). This form of experimentation is claimed to be enhanced by digital tools as well as being an enabler of production of credible, salient, and legitimate science insofar as it embraces a farmer-centric perspective. However, the forms of research in which some experimental activities on farms are anchored vary greatly, notably with regard to the actual forms that interventions on farms take, the legitimacy of the actors involved and their roles, or the observations and instruments applied for interpretation. We propose a systematic review of the literature and an analytical framework in order to better understand this diversity of practices behind on-farm experimentation. Our analysis segregated six major publication clusters based on themes appearing in titles and abstracts. These themes guided a more in-depth analysis of representative articles, from which we identified seven types of OFE practices that are described and discussed here with regard to the knowledge targeted, roles of the various actors, and on-farm experimental space. Our typology provides an original basis for supporting reflexivity and building alignment between the above-mentioned dimensions and the ways in which new tools can support the experimental process.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Lascialfari2022,

title = {Unpacking research lock-in through a diachronic analysis of topic cluster trajectories in scholarly publications},

author = {Matteo Lascialfari and Marie-Benoît Magrini and Guillaume Cabanac},

url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-022-04514-3

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-022-04514-3.pdf?pdf=button%20sticky},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04514-3},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-11-01},

urldate = {2022-11-01},

journal = {Scientometrics},

volume = {127},

abstract = {Lock-in and path-dependency are well-known concepts in economics dealing with unbalanced development of alternative options. Lock-in was studied in various sectors, considering production or consumption sides. Lock-in in academic research went little addressed. Yet, science develops through knowledge accumulation and cross-fertilisation of research topics, that could lead to similar phenomena when some topics do not sufficiently benefit from accumulation mechanisms, reducing innovation opportunities from the concerned field consequently. We introduce an original method to explore these phenomena by comparing topic trajectories in research fields according to strong or weak accumulative processes over time. We combine the concepts of ‘niche’ and ‘mainstream’ from transition studies with scientometric tools to revisit Callon’s strategic diagram with a diachronic perspective of topic clusters over time. Considering the trajectories of semantic clusters, derived from titles and authors’ keywords extracted from scholarly publications in the Web of Science, we applied our method to two competing research fields in food sciences and technology related to pulses and soya over the last 60 years worldwide. These highly interesting species for the sustainability of agrifood systems experienced unbalanced development and thus is under-debated. Our analysis confirms that food research for soya was more dynamic than for pulses: soya topic clusters revealed a stronger accumulative research path by cumulating mainstream positions while pulses research did not meet the same success. This attempt to unpack research lock-in for evaluating the competition dynamics of scientific fields over time calls for future works, by strengthening the method and testing it on other research fields.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Jaramillo2021,

title = {Load modelling and non-intrusive load monitoring to integrate distributed energy resources in low and medium voltage networks},

author = {Andres F. Moreno Jaramillo and David M. Laverty and D. John Morrow and Jesús Martinez del Rincon and Aoife M. Foley},

url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148121010612},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.07.056},

issn = {0960-1481},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-12-01},

urldate = {2021-12-01},

journal = {Renewable Energy},

volume = {179},

pages = {445-466},

abstract = {In many countries distributed energy resources (DER) (e.g. photovoltaics, batteries, wind turbines, electric vehicles, electric heat pumps, air-conditioning units and smart domestic appliances) are part of the ‘Green Deal’ to deliver a climate neutral society. Policy roadmaps, despite providing a framework and penetration targets for DER, often lack the network planning strategies needed to transition from passive to active distribution networks. Currently, DER's dynamic performance parameters and location identification techniques are not fully standardised. In fact, it can be very ad hoc. Standardised distributed load modelling and non-intrusive load monitoring (NILM) for equipment manufacturers, installers and network operators is critical to low and medium voltage network management in order to facilitate better balancing, flexibility and electricity trading across and within the power system for mass DER deployment. The aim of this paper is to fill this load modelling and NILM knowledge gap for DERto inform the ‘Green Deal’ transition and support standardisation. In the paper, existing load modelling techniques and NILM methodologies are critically examined to inform and guide research activity, equipment development and regulator thinking, as well as network operators. Seven key findings that need urgent attention are identified to support a smooth power system reconfiguration.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Barrella2021,

title = {Scient metrics analysis of mangrove studies from 1980 to 2020 },

author = {Walter Barrella and Deborah Ferraz R},

url = {https://medcraveonline.com/JAMB/scient-metrics-analysis-of-mangrove-studies-from-1980-to-2020.html},

doi = {10.15406/jamb.2021.10.00320},

issn = {2378-3184},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-09-28},

urldate = {2021-09-28},

journal = {Journal of Aquaculture & Marine Biology},

volume = {10},

issue = {4},

pages = {188-192},

abstract = {Mangroves are complex transition ecosystems studied and affected by human activities.. This work sought information on articles in scientific journals related to environmental impacts and their forms of management and restoration and those focused on biodiversity conservation. To answer this question, we developed this work based on a scient metric survey of production with a focus on impacts and environmental and Biodiversity responses on mangroves in the last forty years (1980 to 2020), comparing mainly the global scientific production and the production in America, listing areas of research concentration, and journal, period, country and region of publication of papers. With this survey, we could observe a standardization of the research classification area and publication periods, although checking the journals found a great variety of these. As for the regionalization of studies, we could observe that, globally, the region that most contributes to the advancement in this theme is Asia; however, the country that collaborates the most, in isolation, is the United States. Although there is a diversification regarding the specific theme, the scientific production on mangroves with an environmental focus and in Biodiversity followed a global pattern in the studied period.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Lowans2021,

title = {What is the state of the art in energy and transport poverty metrics? A critical and comprehensive review},

author = {Christopher Lowans and Dylan Furszyfer Del Rio and Benjamin K. Sovacool and David Rooney and Aoife M. Foley},

url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988321002668},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105360},

issn = {0140-9883},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-09-01},

urldate = {2021-09-01},

journal = {Energy Economics},

volume = {101},

pages = {105360},

abstract = {This review investigates the state of the art in metrics used in energy (or fuel) and transport poverty with a view to assessing how these overlapping concepts may be unified in their measurement. Our review contributes to ongoing debates over decarbonisation, a politically sensitive and crucial aspect of the energy transition, and one that could exacerbate patterns of inequality or vulnerability. Up to 125 million people across the European Union experience the effects of energy poverty in their daily lives. A more comprehensive understanding of the breadth and depth of these conditions is therefore paramount. This review assessed 1,134 articles and critically analysed a deeper sample of 93. In terms of the use of metrics, we find that multiple indicators are better than any single metric or composite. We find work remains to be conducted in the transport poverty sphere before energy poverty metrics can be fully unified with those of transport poverty, namely the stipulation of travel standards. Without such standards, our ability to unify the metrics of both fields and potentially alleviate both conditions simultaneously is limited. The difficulties in defining necessary travel necessitate the further use of vulnerability lenses and holistic assessments focused on energy and transport services.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Stephens2021,

title = {Digital fooding, cashless marketplaces and reconnection in intermediated third places: Conceptualizing metropolitan food provision in the age of prosumption},

author = {Raphaël Stephens and Marc Barbier},

url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016720317058},

doi = {10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.11.009},

issn = {0743-0167},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-02-01},

urldate = {2021-02-01},

journal = {Journal of Rural Studies},

volume = {82},

pages = {366 - 379},

abstract = {This article adopts the concept of prosumption in order to better understand the array of contemporary food sustainability transition initiatives that often come under the umbrella term of Alternative Food Networks (AFNs). AFNs have developed in parallel to prosumption, which is significant because AFNs are oriented towards localized and direct relationships between producers and consumers, while prosumption explains the hybridization of the consumer into a more complex and productive actor. Scholars argue that producer-consumer reconnections enable greater transparency and information exchange between the two types of actors. In addition, digitalization has recently brought new perspectives for both prosumption and AFN research. We explain the digital food prosumption phenomenon by drawing upon several years of research on an alternative food network with strong digital focus – La Ruche qui dit Oui!. As a decentralized network of local food operations that converge around a digital platform, it provides innovative virtual-material mediations between producers and consumers. This suggests that increasingly, consumers may be getting more deeply engaged in the (co-)production of commodities across different sectors and activities. Thus, while the prosumption and AFN literatures have mostly existed in parallel, future efforts should be made to intersect these two areas of sociological research. This is particularly pertinent today, as both prosumption and AFN phenomena are now increasingly mediated by powerful digital technologies. In the digital age, the alternative food prosumer phenomenon may well contribute to reconfiguring global food flows and industrial cultures towards sustainability.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Marvuglia2020,

title = {Advances and challenges in assessing urban sustainability: an advanced bibliometric review},

author = {Antonino Marvuglia and Lisanne Havinga and Oliver Heidrich and Jimeno Fonseca and Niki Gaitanie and Diana Reckien},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109788},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-03-06},

urldate = {2020-03-06},

journal = {Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews},

abstract = {With nearly 70% of the world population expected to live in cities by 2050, assessing the sustainability of urban systems, both existing and future ones, is becoming increasingly relevant. Making cities more sustainable is a global priority, which is highlighted by ‘Sustainable Cities and Communities’ being listed as one of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) adopted by United Nations Member States in 2015. This Virtual Special Issue (VSI) explores the implementation and assessment of policies and technologies that contribute to the transition to a sustainable, energy efficient and regenerative society. We organized the issue according to four main research themes: 1) Renewable Energy Systems (i.e., different types of systems, qualitative assessments and public acceptance); 2) Sustainable Built Environment (which includes construction, operation and refurbishment); 3) Multi-Scale Models (considering urban sustainability transition from building to districts, or cities and regions to multi-country comparisons and their scaling across different countries); and 4) Governance and Policy (climate change mitigation and adaptation plans/policies that are reported across countries, urban services and infrastructures).



This paper serves two purposes. The first is to provide an analysis about patterns, correlations and synergies found across the different topics that have been addressed over the last 20 years in the literature about cities’ sustainability paths. A bibliometric analysis and a contingency matrix show the degree of correlation between scientific journals and main topics addressed by published articles. Secondly, the paper acts as an Editorial to the VSI, introducing the wealth of research articles and topics included in it. Both the bibliometric analysis and the papers published in this VSI demonstrate the interconnectedness of energy consumption, pollutant emissions and the competition for finite resources. The aim is to present advances and challenges of this exciting and ever-evolving research field to inform and guide future studies of urban sustainability.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{prost2017echanges,

title = {Les échanges virtuels entre agriculteurs : un soutien à leurs transitions professionnelles ?},

author = {Magali Prost and Lorène Prost and Marianne Cerf},

url = {https://www.cairn.info/revue-raisons-educatives-2017-1-page-129.htm},

doi = {10.3917/raised.021.0129},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-01-01},

urldate = {2017-01-01},

journal = {Raisons éducatives},

number = {1},

pages = {129-154},

publisher = {Université de Genève},

abstract = {Depuis la fin du XXe siècle, le modèle français de production agricole est remis en question : construit pour augmenter la productivité par hectare et par travailleur, il est maintenant reconnu en partie responsable de la dégradation de l’environnement et de la santé des travailleurs agricoles (Meynard, Dedieu, & Bos, 2012 ; Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005). Dans ce contexte, il existe une volonté de promouvoir une agriculture qui permette une production agricole économiquement viable, socialement équitable, et ne nuisant ni à l’environnement ni à la santé. Aller vers une telle agriculture implique de profonds changements, notamment une reconfiguration des situations de travail et des conditions d’exercice des métiers des acteurs du monde agricole, et en particulier des agriculteurs (e.g. Coquil, 2014). En effet, si les agriculteurs ont toujours été confrontés à un environnement de travail ouvert et dynamique (Cerf & Sagory, 2004), la révolution agricole qui a suivi la Seconde Guerre mondiale a cherché à atténuer cette spécificité. L’usage de pesticides, d’engrais chimiques, de l’irrigation, l’amélioration des variétés et leur adaptation à ces produits a permis un contrôle des facteurs de production et l’obtention de rendements stables et élevés. Revenir aujourd’hui à une forme d’agriculture qui favorise des régulations naturelles, dite agroécologique, réexpose les agriculteurs à de l’incertitude, du non-contrôlable, des phénomènes complexes sur lesquels ils ne disposent pas forcément de connaissances stabilisées. Qui plus est, si des connaissances scientifiques existent pour aborder ces questions, elles sont souvent très partielles, et parfois font l’objet de controverses au sein du monde scientifique. Il ne s’agit donc pas, ou pas seulement, de favoriser la transmission de ces connaissances scientifiques. Par ailleurs, même s’il existe des agriculteurs qui ont déjà mis en place une pratique agroécologique, il ne s’agit pas non plus uniquement de transmettre leur expertise à d’autres. Pourquoi ? Parce que tout dépend du projet de vie et de travail de l’agriculteur, des moyens de production dont il dispose, des conditions pédoclimatiques de son exploitation, des possibilités de commercialisation, etc. Pour réussir sa transition professionnelle, chaque agriculteur doit donc revoir en profondeur son activité pour combiner de façon renouvelée son projet, ses moyens de production, ses débouchés, ses modes d’action.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{rule2015lexical,

title = {Lexical shifts, substantive changes, and continuity in State of the Union discourse, 1790-2014},

author = {Alix Rule and Jean-Philippe Cointet and Peter Bearman},

url = {https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1512221112},

doi = {10.1073/pnas.1512221112},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-01-01},

urldate = {2015-01-01},

journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},

volume = {112},

number = {35},

pages = {10837-10844},

publisher = {National Acad Sciences},

abstract = {This study reveals that the entry into World War I in 1917 indexed the decisive transition to the modern period in American political consciousness, ushering in new objects of political discourse, a more rapid pace of change of those objects, and a fundamental reframing of the main tasks of governance. We develop a strategy for identifying meaningful categories in textual corpora that span long historic durées, where terms, concepts, and language use changes. Our approach is able to account for the fluidity of discursive categories over time, and to analyze their continuity by identifying the discursive stream as the object of interest.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{keating2013therapy,

title = {Therapy’s shadow: a short history of the study of resistance to cancer chemotherapy},

author = {Peter Keating and Alberto Cambrosio and Nicole Nelson and Andrei Mogoutov and Jean-Philippe Cointet},

url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2013.00058},

doi = {10.3389/fphar.2013.00058},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-01-01},

urldate = {2013-01-01},

journal = {Frontiers in pharmacology},

volume = {4},

pages = {58},

publisher = {Frontiers},

abstract = {This article traces the history of research on resistance to drug therapy in oncology using scientometric techniques and qualitative analysis. Using co-citation analysis, we generate maps to visualize subdomains in resistance research in two time periods, 1975–1990 and 1995–2010. These maps reveal two historical trends in resistance research: first, a shift in focus from generic mechanisms of resistance to chemotherapy to a focus on resistance to targeted therapies and molecular mechanisms of oncogenesis; and second, a movement away from an almost exclusive reliance on animal and cell models and toward the generation of knowledge about resistance through clinical trial work. A close reading of highly cited articles within each subdomain cluster reveals specific points of transition from one regime to the other, in particular the failure of several promising theories of resistance to be translated into clinical insights and the emergence of interest in resistance to a new generation of targeted agents such as imatinib and trastuzumab. We argue that the study of resistance in the oncology field has thus become more integrated with research into cancer therapy – rather than constituting it as a separate domain of study, as it has done in the past, contemporary research treats resistance as the flip side to treatment, as therapy’s shadow.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}