CorText Manager around the world

@article{Lowans2021,

title = {What is the state of the art in energy and transport poverty metrics? A critical and comprehensive review},

author = {Christopher Lowans and Dylan Furszyfer Del Rio and Benjamin K. Sovacool and David Rooney and Aoife M. Foley},

url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988321002668},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105360},

issn = {0140-9883},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-09-01},

urldate = {2021-09-01},

journal = {Energy Economics},

volume = {101},

pages = {105360},

abstract = {This review investigates the state of the art in metrics used in energy (or fuel) and transport poverty with a view to assessing how these overlapping concepts may be unified in their measurement. Our review contributes to ongoing debates over decarbonisation, a politically sensitive and crucial aspect of the energy transition, and one that could exacerbate patterns of inequality or vulnerability. Up to 125 million people across the European Union experience the effects of energy poverty in their daily lives. A more comprehensive understanding of the breadth and depth of these conditions is therefore paramount. This review assessed 1,134 articles and critically analysed a deeper sample of 93. In terms of the use of metrics, we find that multiple indicators are better than any single metric or composite. We find work remains to be conducted in the transport poverty sphere before energy poverty metrics can be fully unified with those of transport poverty, namely the stipulation of travel standards. Without such standards, our ability to unify the metrics of both fields and potentially alleviate both conditions simultaneously is limited. The difficulties in defining necessary travel necessitate the further use of vulnerability lenses and holistic assessments focused on energy and transport services.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Elie2021,

title = {The different types of renewable energy finance: A Bibliometric analysis},

author = {Luc Elie and Caroline Granier and Sandra Rigot},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104997},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-01-01},

journal = {Energy Economics},

number = {104997},

abstract = {This article surveys the academic research dedicated to the different types of renewable energy finance. We conduct a bibliometric analysis based on the widely used database Web of Science, covering the period of 1992 to 2018. We generate a bottom-up clustering of academic articles using network analysis tools, leading us to identify 8 main clusters of publications defined by their focus on specific types of finance and their geographical and technological scope. Our main line of research is to observe the discrepancy between the importance of the funding modes in reality and their share in the literature. The critical appraisal of our results highlights that the literature does not reflect the diversity of renewable energy finance. Most studies focus on market-based policy instruments used to support renewable energy development in developed countries. Conversely, few studies of direct financing flows from the public and private sectors were found, while private sources provide an important part of renewable energy investment globally. Furthermore, the literature generally focuses on mature renewable electricity technologies (solar and wind). Our dynamic analysis reveals that private investment is an emerging subject. Overall, our result reveals significant room for development of the field.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}